Friday, December 28, 2007

.: BHUTTO’S ASSASSINATION, NO CLEVER TITTLE HERE :.

Bhutto’s assassination will be yet another blemish on the heads of extreme Muslins. Never forget you will always be “The Internal Infidel”. Hate speech, yes to those that posses a week mind. Our thoughts go out to those that live under the tyrannical hand of the traditional Muslim state. It just seems whenever equality and democracy try reaching its hand out of the drowning oil its slapped back down. Is this systemic of a religion or a people? You tell me…

Respectfully,

The Napalm

P.S. I wonder if Musharraf slept a little better last night?





http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=haH7M5jR9D4&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G7z1Qd8OpAc&feature=related

Friday, December 14, 2007

.: A HOUSE THAT IS DIVIDED WILL FALL :.


This was a very interesting article sent to me. You be the judge? I do not believe this article is hate speech. It shares some very valid points on loyalty and allegiance to principles that are in direct contradiction to American ideologies. Again, you make the call.

Can any good religious person be a good American when they think their Holy book is above the American Constitution?


Can a Good Muslim be a Good American?

Interesting questions for the
Muslim Community to discuss & for

research on our part also.

Can a good Muslim be a good American? I forwarded that question to a
friend who worked in Saudi Arabia for 20 years. The following was his response…

Theologically - no. Because his allegiance is to Allah, the moon God
of Arabia. Religiously - no. Because no other religion is accepted by
his Allah except Islam (Quran, 2:256)


Scripturally - no. Because his allegiance is to the five pillars of
Islam and the Quran (Koran).

Geographically - no. Because his allegiance is to Mecca, to which he
turns in prayer five times a day.

Socially - no. Because his allegiance to Islam forbids him to make

friends with Christians or Jews.


Politically - no. Because he must submit to the mullah (spiritual
leaders), who teach annihilation of Israel and Destruction of
America, the great Satan.


Domestically - no. Because he is instructed to marry four women and
beat and scourge his wife when she disobeys him (Quran 4:34 ).

Intellectually - no. Because he cannot accept the American

Constitution since it is based on Biblical principles and he believes

the Bible to be corrupt.

Philosophically - no. Because Islam, Muhammad, and the Quran do not

allow freedom of religion and expression.

Democracy and Islam cannot co-exist. Every
Muslim government is

either dictatorial or autocratic.

Spiritually - no. Because when we declare "one nation under God,"

the Christians God is loving and kind, while Allah is NEVER referred

to as heavenly father, nor is he ever called love in The Qurans 99

excellent names.

Therefore after much study and deliberation.... Perhaps we should be very suspicious of ALL MUSLIMS in this country. They obviously cannot be both "good" Muslims and good Americans. Call it what you wish. Its still the truth.You had better believe it! If you find yourself intellectually in agreement with the above statements, perhaps you will share this with your friends. The more who understand this, the better it will be for our country and our future.


THE NAPALM

P.S. What are your opinions that it takes two women to equal the word of one man under Islam? Is this this the world you want?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iWGA8i6scYY&feature=related

http://bibleprobe.com/muhammad.htm

and across the pond...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=maHSOB2RFm4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HhN6CG1zCRc&feature=related





Wednesday, December 12, 2007

Rudy on the watch...

As of December 12, 2007
Per Latest National GOP Poll: Rudy 25% Huckabee 19% Romney 17% Thompson 14% McCain 12% Paul 3%

Although Rudy has seen poll numbers decreasing with the Huckabee boom, he has to be reassured in the second part of the choice above - his clear double digit lead in the first and second place choices.

Giuliani’s “Big State” strategy is predicated on maintaining a national poll lead particularly for fundraising support. With his apparent second or third place finishes in Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina, the Giuliani campaign must now marshall their resources in Florida and move to the big states, including California and Illinois.

The race continues to be fluid and indeed may be headed toward a protracted state by state and delegate by delegate campaign - Something although exciting for the public is not relished by the national GOP.
Stay tuned…….

He's The Only One..



ConservativeChatroom.com Director had the opportunity to meet Rudy at a private function last night.

Facts & Commentary to follow tomorrow. In the meantime, please click on picture above to see why Rudy is our only hope.

Monday, December 10, 2007

Breaking News...


Republican presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani convinces his opponent Democratic candidate Hilary R. Clinton that her chances of winning presidency are slowly diminishing. All it took was a refresher of her husband’s most recent sexual escapades. Left without a voice or choice she agrees and takes the route with the NY subway...

Sunday, December 9, 2007

Liberal Science


I can't help, but rehash the recent Nobel Prize Award presented to "Mr. Science Al Gore". I can't help but wonder where did the sudden praise and honorary attributes come from? Well, he's made a slide show movie (The Inconvenient Truth), which by majority focused on his political achievements, his admirable family life, his son's car accident and other family occurrences. How is it that anyone is able to get away with producing a movie about conflicting facts which have not been precisely proven by science? Al Gore has been preaching global warning junk for over 20 years, but so has been my college geology teacher.

In 1999 I was a witness of a speech preaching to me about distinction of oil in 10 years. Well, we are about a year away from that fact and I am pretty darn sure we won't be without oil in 2009. Al Gore and the entire liberal Hollywood media announced just that in 1988. We had 20 years to fix global warming or we'll all die. Why isn't anyone hunting down those who have made such statements and who have not retracted such statements? Why isn't anyone looking for Al Gore and attempting to repossess his prize? Al Gore received a Nobel Prize Award for talking only speculated global warning data, which we all know is a schemical ploy in which he used disastrous and worst case scenarios, to attract uneducated audience and in turn use it for his political plotting. It was more then evident that he was building ammunition for the upcoming election. Thankfully he is not running. Is he scared? Is it because Mr. Green Science is an over consumer of energy?

Not too long after his PP was released, the department of energy provided facts about his home life consumption of energy. Al Gore consumes 20 times more energy per year than the national average. The facts about his consumption provided from 2005 to current have increased each year. Why does Mr. Green Science (I named him that myself) get away with flying private jets from coast to coast? The fuel burned by a private jet making a roundtrip from coast to coast burns as much fuel as a Hummer does in 2 years I really have to site the fact Gore made at the GP Award ceremony last October. He states that " accumulation of green house gasses is a moral issue, it is deeply unethical." What does it than make him? What does it make the Hollywood elite, which created the movie for Mr. Green and which only flies private jets? It makes them all Liberal Hypocrites. I recommend that you take a gander at the movie and not only will your 8 th grade geography facts come up to surface, but you'll be able to argue Gore's unfounded facts and tackle his wrong explanations. The man says the atmosphere is relatively thin and it is being "thickened" by huge quantities of carbon dioxide. It is not the density that matters it is the chemistry of carbon dioxide that does. He simply has no idea what he's talking about.

My favorite part of the movie would have to be the way Mr. Green's persona is being outlined in the movie. He is the hero, the warrior for green planet, the crusader for green justice, standing alone or walking alone in the darkened barn. The scenes are meant to portray our inability to imagine the burden Mr. Green bears…. for the human society.

In any way, the facts made by Al Gore were over exaggerated, misleading, worst case scenario plays to scare the general public, blame the conservatives for fighting an oil war and praise Democrats for another job well done!

Sources: To be added


Saturday, December 8, 2007

Pharmaceutical Company Introduces New Blockbuster Drug!

No record of FDA approval up to date. So how was John Kerry and Howard Dean able to get their hands on this miracle drug for the '04 primaries?

Friday, December 7, 2007

Refreshment of Terror


A quick refresher for those who undermine the threat of Terrorism to our Great Nation. Please view the following video.
Gingrich nails it.




VIDEO

Tuesday, December 4, 2007

Introducing the Scandalcrats

Now more than ever is a time when the TRUTH BE KNOWN...


The truth about the Democrats......now referred to at the Conservative chatroom as.....


The Scandalcrats.



Let's take a Look.... Starting with Sex Scandals.

President John Kennedy had a known affair with actress Jayne Mansfield and Marilyn Monroe. Both ignored by the popular media.




Bill Clinton raped Paula Jones and was blown by Monica Lewinsky.




Gavin Newsome, Mayor of San Fransisco had an affair with his best friend's wife, while Newsome was separated from his. His wife was better looking too.

Sen. Daniel Inouye. The 82-year-old Hawaii Democrat was accused in the 1990s by numerous women of sexual harassment. Democrats cast doubt on the allegations and the Senate Ethics Committee dropped its investigation.

Former Rep. Gus Savage. The Illinois Democrat was accused of fondling a Peace Corps volunteer in 1989 while on a trip to Africa. The House Ethics Committee decided against disciplinary action in 1990.


Rep. Barney Frank. The obnoxious outspoken Massachusetts Democrat hired a male prostitute who ran a prostitution service from Frank’s residence in the 1980s. Only two Democrats in the House of Representatives voted to censure him in 1990.


Former Sen. Brock Adams. The late Washington Democrat was forced to stop campaigning after numerous accusations of drugging, assault and rape, the first surfacing in 1988. Quality guy.

Former Rep. Fred Richmond. This New York Democrat was arrested in 1978 for soliciting sex from a 16-year-old. He remained in Congress and won re-election—before eventually resigning in 1982 after pleading guilty to tax evasion and drug possession. Another quality Scandalcrat..


Former Rep. John Young. The late Texas Democrat increased the salary of a staffer after she gave in to his sexual advances.
Former Rep. Mel Reynolds. The Illinois Democrat was convicted of 12 counts of sexual assault with a 16-year-old. President Bill Clinton pardoned him before leaving office.

Sen. Teddy Kennedy. The liberal Massachusetts senator testified in defense of nephew accused of rape, invoking his family history to win over the jury in 1991. Ooops.. Let's not forget how the Massachusetts. Senator pleaded guilty to leaving the scene of an accident, after his car plunged off a bridge on Chappaquiddick Island killing passenger Mary Jo Kopechne.

Former Rep. Gerry Studds. He was censured for sexual relationship with underage male page in 1983. Massachusetts voters returned him to office for six more terms.

Shall I go On? Nah... I won't elaborate too much now.. Just stay tuned for Volume 2...


Sources: BoycottLiberalism.com, tinyninjas.com and wikiprotest.com



Wednesday, November 28, 2007

.: THE NUMBERS DONT LIE, WHAT ABOUT THOSE WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION? :.

I was sent an interesting e-mail. I checked out the statistics and they seem to be true. You be the judge...




Regardless of where you stand on the issue of the U.S. involvement in Iraq, here's a sobering statistic.

There has been a monthly average of 160,000 troops in the Iraq theatre of operations during the last 22 months, and a total of 2,867 deaths.

That gives a firea
rm death rate of 60 per 100,000 soldiers.

The firearm death rate in Washington D.C. is 80.6 per 100,000 persons for the same period. That means that you are about 25% more likely to be shot and killed in the U.S. Capital than you are in Iraq.

Conclusion: The U.S. should pull out of Washington.


Respectfully,
THE NAPALM



Monday, November 19, 2007

.: Burn The Leaches Off! .:


Its just unfortunate but true... Hear are some more great facts... Enjoy!!!

I did not create this. However, I investigated it and found the statistics spot on:

THIS HAS GOT TO BE PASSED ALONG TO AS MANY AS POSSIBLE OR WE WILL ALL GO DOWN THE DRAIN BECAUSE A FEW DON'T CARE.

This English teacher has phrased it the best I've seen yet

Tomatoes and Cheap Labor

CHEAP TOMATO
ES?
This should make everyone think, be you De
mocrat, Republican or Independent

From a California
school teacher - - -


"As you listen to the news about the student protests over illegal immigration, there are some things that you should be aware of:

I am in charge of the English-as-a-second-language department at a large southern
California high school which is designated a Title 1 school, meaning that its students average lower socioeconomic
and income levels.

Most of the schools you are hearing about, South Gate High,
Bell Gardens , Huntington Park , etc., where these students are protesting, are also Title 1 schools.

Title 1 schools are on the free breakfast and free lunch program. When I say free breakfast, I'm not talking a glass of milk and roll -- but a full breakfast and cereal bar with fruits and juices that would make a Marriott proud. The waste of this food is monumental, with trays and trays of it being dumped in the trash uneaten. (
OUR TAX DOLLARS AT WORK )

I estimate that well over 50% of these students are obese or at least moderately overweight. About 75% or more DO have
cell phones. The school also provides day care centers for the unwed teenage pregnant girls (some as young as 13) so they can attend class without the inconvenience of having to arrange for babysitters or having family watch their kids. (OUR TAX DOLLARS AT WORK)

I was ordered to spend $700,000 on my department or risk losing
funding for the upcoming year even though there was little need for anything; my budget was already substantial. I ended up buying new computers for the computer learning center, half of which, one month later, have been carved with graffiti by the appreciative students who obviously feel humbled and grateful to have a free education in
America . (OUR TAX DOLLARS AT WORK)

I have had to intervene several times for young and substitute teachers whose classes consist of many illegal immigrant students here in the country less then 3 months who raised so much hell with the female teachers, calling them "Putas" whores and throwing things that the teachers were in tears.

Free medical, free education, free food, day care
etc., etc, etc. Is it any wonder they feel entitled to not only be in this country but to demand rights, privileges and entitlements ?

To those who want to point out how much these illegal immigrants contribute to our society because they LIKE their gardener and housekeeper and they like to pay less for tomatoes: spend some time in the real world of illegal immigration and see the TRUE costs.

Higher insurance, medical facilities closing , higher medical costs, more crime, lower standards of education in our schools, overcrowding, new diseases etc., etc, etc . For me, I'll pay more for tomatoes.

We need to wake up. The guest worker program will be a disaster because we won't have the guts to enforce it . Does anyone in their right mind really think they will voluntarily leave and return?


It does, however, have everything to do with culture: A third-world culture that does not value education , that accepts children getting pregnant and dropping out of school by 15 and that refuses to assimilate , and an
American culture that has become so weak and worried about " politically correctness" that we don't have the will to do anything about it.

If this makes your
blood boil , as it did mine, forward this to everyone you know.

CHEAP LABOR? Isn't that what the whole immigration issue is about?

Business doesn't want to pay a decent wage.

Consumers don't want expensive produce.

Government will tell you Americans don't want the jobs.

But the bottom line is cheap labor. The phrase "cheap labor" is a
myth , a farce, and a lie. There is no such thing as "cheap labor."

Take, for example, an illegal alien with a wife and five children. He takes a job for
$5.00 or 6.00/hour. At that wage, with six dependents,
he pays no income tax, yet at the end of the year, if he files an Income Tax Return, he gets an " earned income credit" of up to $3,200 free.

He qualifies for
Section 8 housing and subsidized rent.

He qualifies for
food stamps.

He qualifies for free (no deductible, no co-pay) health care.

His
children get free breakfasts and lunches
at school.
He
requires bilingual teachers and books.

He
qualifies for relief from high energy bills.

If
they are or become, aged, blind or disabled , they qualify for SSI. Once qualified for SSI they can qualify for Medicare. All of this is at (our) taxpayer's expense .

He doesn't worry about car insurance, life insurance, or homeowners insurance.

Taxpayers provide
Spanish language signs, bulletins and printed material.

He and his family receive the equivalent of $20.00 to $30.00/hour in
benefits.

Working Americans
are lucky to have $5.00 or $6.00/hour left after paying their bills and his.

The American taxpayers also pay for increased crime, graffiti and trash clean-up.

Cheap labor? YEAH RIGHT!
Wake up people!

THESE ARE THE QUESTIONS WE SHOULD BE ADDRESSING TO THE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES FOR EITHER PARTY. 'AND WHEN THEY LIE TO US AND DON'T DO AS THEY SAY, WE SHOULD REPLACE THEM AT ONCE!'

THIS HAS GOT TO BE PASSED ALONG TO AS MANY AS POSSIBLE OR WE WILL ALL GO DOWN THE DRAIN BECAUSE A FEW DON'T CARE.


Respectfully,

The Napalm

P.S.

Gardner I like how you grow lies. You’re not fooling anyone here but yourself. Please get an education. Oh wait my hard work and taxes should pay for that. You’re playing checkers with a chess player. Please go back to the drawing board, your Nazi propaganda will not work here. I got the reaction I wanted out of you puppet. I just pull the strings and you dance. I love it! Have a great day!


In addition, to the uneducated person that states "My expierience" with mexicans in the united states. NO ONE CARES ABOUT YOUR EXPIERINCE. THIS IS ABOUT STONE COLD FACTS AND YOUR DEAD WRONG! READ MY ARTICLES. YOU CLOWNS HAVE YET TO PROVE ONE FACT INACURATE. YOU KNOW WHY? YOU CAN'T! CHECK MATE TRAITOR!


Thursday, November 15, 2007


Here is another great article... Enjoy

So much for the professional mexicans in the US saying we need the aliens.

WHAT IF 2
0 MILLION ILLEGAL ALIENS VACATED AMERICA?


By Frosty Wooldridge
October 29, 2007
NewsWithViews.com
Tina Griego, journa
list for the Denver Rocky Mountain News wrote a column
titled, "Mexican visitor's lament" -- 10/25/07.
She interviewed Mexican journalist Evangelina Hernandez while visiting
Denver last week. Hernandez said,

"They (illegal aliens) pay rent, buy groceries, buy clothes...what happens
to your country's economy if
20 million people go away?"
That's a good question - it deserves an answer. Over 80 percent of
Americans demand secured borders a
nd illegal migration stopped. But what would
happen if all 20 million or more vacated America?
The answers may surprise you!



a.. In California, if 3.5 million illegal aliens moved back to Mexico,
it would leave an extra $10.2 billion to spend on overloaded school systems,

bankrupted hospitals and overrun prisons. It would leave highways cleaner, safer
and less congested. Everyone could understand one another as English became the
dominate language again.
b.. In Colorado, 500,000 illegal migrants, plus their 300,000 kids and
grand-kids - would move back "home," mostly to Mexico. That would save
Coloradans an estimated $2 billion (other experts say $7 BIL) annually in taxes
that pay for schooling, medical, social-services and incarceration costs. It
means 12,000 gang members would vanish out of Denv
er alone.
c.. Colorado would save more than $20 million in prison costs, and the
terror that those 7,300 alien criminals set upon local citizens. Denver Officer
Don Young and hundreds of Colorado victims wou
ld not have suffered death,
accidents, rapes and other crimes by illegals.
d.. Denver Public Schools would not suffer a 67 percent drop out/flunk
out rate via thousands of illegal alien students speaking 41 different
languages. At least 200,000 vehicles would vanish from our gridlocked cities in
Colorado. Denver's four percent unemployment rate would vanish as our working
poor would gain jobs at a living wage.
e.. In Florida, 1.5 million illegals would return the Sunshine State
back to America, the rule of law and Englis
h.
f.. In Chicago, Illinois, 2.1 million illegals would free up hospitals,
schools, prisons and highways for a safer, cleaner and more crime-free
experience.

If 20 million illegal aliens returned "home," the U.S. economy would
return to the rule of law. Employers would hire legal American citizens at a

living wage. Everyone would pay their fair share of taxes because they wouldn't
be working off the books. That would result in an additional $401 billion in IRS
income taxes collected annually, an d an equal amount for local state and city
coffers.

No more push '1' for Spanish or '2' for English. No more confusion in
American schools that now must content with over 100 languages that degrade the educational system for American kids.
Our overcrowded schools would lose morethan two million illegal alien kids at a cost of billionsin ESL and free breakfasts and lunches.
We would lose 500,000 illegal criminal alien inmates at a cost of more
than $1.6 billion annually. That includes 15,000 MS-13 gang members who
distribute $130 billion in drugs annually would vacate our country. In cities
like L.A., 20,000 members of the "18th Street Gang" would vanish from our
nation. No more Mexican forgery gangs for ID theft from Americans! No more
foreign rapists and child molesters!
Losing more than 20 million people would clear up our
crowded highways and
gridlock. Cleaner air and less drinking and driving American deaths by illegal
aliens! <>Drain on America's economy; taxpayers harmed, employers get rich
Over $80 billion annually wouldn't return to their home countries by cash
transfers. Illegal migrants earned half that money untaxe
d, which further drains
America's economy - which currently suffers an $8.7 trillion debt.
At least 400,000 anchor babies would not be born in our country, costing
us $109 billion per year per cycle. At least 86 hospitals in California, Georgia
and Florida would still be operating instead of being bankrupted out of
existence because illegals pay nothing via the EMTOLA Act.
Americans wouldn't
suffer thousands of TB and hepatitis cases rampant in our country-brought in by
illegals unscreened at our borders.
Our cities would see 20 million less people driving, p
olluting and grid
locking our cities. It would also put the "progressives" on the horns of a
dilemma; illegal aliens and their families cause 11 percent of our greenhouse
gases.
Over one million of Mexico's poorest citizens now live inside and along
our border from Brownsville, Texas to San Diego, California in what the New York
Times called, "colonias" or new neighborhoods. Trouble is, those living areas
resemble Bombay and Calcutta where grinding poverty, filth, diseases, drugs,
crimes, no sanitation and worse. They live without se
wage, clean water, streets,
electricity, roads or any kind of sanitation. The New York Times reported them
to be America's new "Third World" inside our own country. Within 20 years, at
their current growth rate, they expect 20 million residents of those colonias.
(I've seen them personally in Texas and Arizona; it's sickening beyond anything
you can imagine.) By enforcing our laws, we could repatriate them back to
Mexico. High integrity, ethical invitation We invite 20 million aliens to go home, fix their own countries and/or make a better life in Mexico. We invite a million people into our country
legally more than all other countries combined
annually. We cannot and must not
allow anarchy at our borders, more anarchy within our borders and growing
lawlessness at every level in our nation.

It's time to stand up for our country, our culture, our civilization and
our way of life.

The Napalm

P.S. What America do you want to live in? This is the part where a liberal calls me a "racist" or a "bigot" because they can't argue the facts. IT TIME TO TAKE IT BACK!

To "The Gardner" It does not matter if your a Republican Illegal Alien. I would take you by the ear and throw your law breaking ass out of my country. You forget Gardner part of my family were LEGAL IMMIGRANTS. They came through Ellis Island legally, swore an oath to this country and learned the language. You use words like racist because you have no facts to fall back on. My statistics crush and dismantle your week train of thought, you are unable to adapt or overcome because you are uneducated and have a hateful view towards my country men. We owe you nothing and you are stealing my future that my forefathers worked so hard to create. Your government is corrupt and takes advantage of its people. So, before you tell me I have a sliver in my eye take the plank out of yours. The United States might have taken people in at one time, (and oh ya... We still take in more people than the rest of the world combined!!!) This does not mean that we should continue to do so and destroy our way of life. You are selfish and short sighted. Furthermore, from our cold dead hands will you lay waste to this great nation. Were mounting up. Just like we mopped the floor with Santa Anna we will do so again with your law breaking kind. Press #1 for English and have a nice day.


THE PEOPLE ARE STARTING TO GET REALLY PISSED, I SMELL CHANGE COMING!!!


Thursday, November 8, 2007

.: FROM THEIR COLD DEAD HANDS? :.


By now you probably think I'm a gun totting, tobacco chewing, stars n' bars – son uh bitch. Not really… However, I did decided to shut my mouth and show you something I received an e-mail on. As far as I know it’s anonymous. I researched the statements and
they seem very accurate. You be the judge...


In 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control.
From 1929 to 1953, about 20 million dissidents, unable to defend themselves,
were rounded up and
exterminated.

In 1911, Turkey established gun
control. From 1915
to 1917, 1.5 million Armenians, unable to defend themselves,
were rounded
up and exterminated.



Germany established gun control in 1938 and from
1939 to 1945, a total of 13
million Jews and others who were unable to defend themselves were rounded and exterminated.

China established gun control in 1935. From 1948 to 1952, 20 million political dissidents, unable to defend themselves,
were rounded up and
exterminated

Guatemala established gun control in 1964. From 1964
to 1981, 10
0,000 Mayan Indians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded
up and exterminated.

Uganda established gun control in 1970. From 1971 to
1979, 300,000
Christians, unable to defend themselves, were
rounded up and exterminated.

Cambodia established gun control in 1956. From 1975
to 1977, one million 'educated' people, unable to defend themselves, were
rounded up and murdered.

Defenseless people rounded up and exterminated in the 20th Century because of gun control: 56 million.

It has now been 12 months since gun owners in Australia were forced by new law to surrender 640,381 personal firearms to be destroyed by their own government, a program costing Australia taxpayers more than $500 million dollars!

The first year results are now in:
List of 7 items:
Australia-wide, homicides are up 3.2 percent
Australia-wide, assaults are up 8.6 percent
Australia-wide, armed robberies are up 44 percent

(yes, 44 percent)!

In the state of Victoria alone, homicides with firearms are now up 300 percent. Note that while the law-abiding citizens turned them in, the criminals did not, and criminals still possess their
guns!

While figures over the previous 25 years showed a
steady decrease in armed robbery with firearms, this has changed drastically
upward in the past 12 months, since criminals now are guaranteed that
their prey is unarmed.

There has also been a dramatic increase in break-ins and assaults of the ELDERLY. Australian politicians are at a loss to explain how public safety has decreased, after such monumental effort and expense was expended in successfully ridding Australian society of guns The Australian experience and the other historical facts above prove it. You won't see this data on the US evening news, or hear politicians disseminating this information.

Guns in the hands of honest citizens save lives and
property and, yes, gun-control laws adversely affect only the
law-abiding citizens.

Take note my fellow Americans, before it's too late!

The next time someone talks in favor of gun control, please remind them of
this history lesson.

With guns, we are 'citizens'.

Without them, we are 'subjects'.

During WWII the Japanese decided not to invade
America because they knew
most Americans were ARMED!

If you value your freedom, Please spread this
anti-gun control message to
all of your friends.

Respectfully,

The Napalm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z5eXFeW0aI0

P.S. Ann Coulter has a great chapter in her new book on the liberal agenda to take away your second amendment rights. Don't forget the line between liberalism and socialism is a very fine one.

Join the NRA today!!! Call yourself a REAL Republican do you? Don't feel bad, I know you just want to talk the talk and not walk the walk. Really, its fine, give those who want to take your rights no resistance. I'm sure the work you've been putting in at the bar, flappin' your lips about how much liberals suck, over a couple cocktails is making a huge difference! Go get em' tiger!

Yes, I am a member.

http://membership.nrahq.org/default.asp?campaignid=XR017807

Sunday, November 4, 2007

.: HAY-SOOS STOP "CROSSING" MY BORDER :.



The other night at dinner, I had the unfortunate experience of trying to speak logic to a liberal. As usual the political onslaught of liberal inequity perforated to the surface. We started talking about ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION. In liberal talk, they are called “Immigrants". He then asked me if I’m a Christian (I immediately see his next coarse of argument...Oh and here it predictably comes). He stated, “Well if your Christian, did Jesus not break the laws of his time? Was Jesus not a rebel? He overturned tables in the temple! Would Jesus not try to help everyone,? Jesus would try to help these “Immigrants"! Jesus would approve of the“Immigrants" breaking our law established by our democratic government and that Jesus did not observe the rules of the authorities. he routinely broke the laws".

This is how I dismantled him…

Now, the first issue that must be discussed is the three tiered form of Government Jesus dealt with (This statement is an oxymoron itself, because Christ is the ultimate authority) . During Jesus time the epicenter of authority for this part of the world was Rome. The leaders of Rome during Jesus Christs time were Augustus (30 B.C. - A.D. 14) Jesus' birth (circa 5 B.C.) (Luke 2) Tiberius (AD. 14-37). Included in this top level of authority was Pontius Pilate Governor of Judea from 26 CE to 36 CE. Now, this form of Roman government worshiped false gods and certainly did not adhere to the laws of the Torah. The second level would be the vassal kings of the Herodian Family, Herod the Great - (Matthew 2:1-19, Luke 1:5) - Authority over Palestine at time of Jesus' birth and Herod Antipas - (Mark 6:14-29, Luke 3:1, 13:31-35, 23:7-12) - Controlled Galilee and Perea during Jesus'; public ministry. In addition, the Herodian family did not practice the laws of the Torah. The last being The Pharisees. There were around 6,000 Pharisees during Jesus' time on earth. Pharisees were leaders in the local synagogue. Most every Jewish community had their own synagogue, while there was only one temple and it was in Jerusalem.

Jesus did not routinely break the Laws. In fact he never even broke one law. Pilate was convinced of Jesus' innocence and sent Him to Herod, who in turn, sent Him back to Pilate, who yielded to the pressure of the Chief Priests and their supporters, to gain popularity for himself. Pilot stated I am innocent of the blood of this righteous man; see ye to it . In addition, Pilot stated: "I am innocent of this Man's blood; see to that yourselves." Mathew 27:24 Then Pilate took water and washed his hands - This was a custom frequently used among the heathens as well as among the Jews, in token of innocence. Pilot also stated that he found no fault with Jesus.

These were the charges leveled against Jesus by the Pharisees. 1) He threatened to destroy The Temple, 2) He claimed to be the Son of God, 3) He stirred up the Jewish people against Caesar of Rome. The false testimonies of the first and third charge against Jesus were not successful, therefore according to Legislation the matter should have been dropped, also according to the Jewish law, the false witnesses, who had failed in their accusations because of contradictions, should have been put to death themselves.

According to scripture Jesus NEVER broke one single law of men, Jesus never challenged the laws of man, nor did he ever break the word of God! Make no mistake the law of the Pharisees was the law given by God! Jesus is God himself part of the trinity. Therefore, the law of God.

John

14The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[d] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Ahhh. But what about the Temple?

Well, If the son of God is knocking over money changers and vendors in his fathers house, who is the authority here? Furthermore, since when did money changers and vendors become authority? These people were breaking the Law of God in God's most sacred house. Jesus broke no laws.

Jesus is the ultimate authority. How can the ultimate authority challenge itself? It cant!

Now, what would Jesus say about illegal aliens. Well according to scripture, Jesus loves each and everyone of us. However, Jesus would also state and he also lived his life, following the laws of man. He would not approve of illegal aliens breaking our law established by a democratic society. He would want illegal aliens to go through the proper channels of becoming a citizen. It is unfair to other nationalities that follow United States procedure concerning immigration. The ship can only hold so many passengers before it will sink. The liberal quickly changed the conversation to something about Britney Spears.

Now, obviously I did not rattle off these precise dates. However, my argument did follow this structure and I tightened it up for this blog.

Respectfully,
The Napalm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pwqdBkaWsTA

P.S. I'm not a "holly roller" I just believe in common sense. That’s the thing with these liberals; they choose not to explore Jesus or God because they want to live by their own set of rules and ignore causality to fit their own distorted agenda, just as the Pharisees did. Remember, you can NEVER fully trust a man or woman that does not answer to something higher than themselves.

SIDE NOTE: Many of you may have scene "The Lost Tomb of Jesus" a documentary film by Simcha Jacobovici and James Cameron. This film casts doubt on the legitimacy of Christ. I'm not Catholic however, fact is fact. DON'T BELIEVE THE HYPE. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oxtioL7fCIg