Sunday, October 28, 2007

.: Border...What Border? .:


Is anyone fed up with this? Lets break this down with fact. 40% of adult African American males (18-65) do not have full time employment (this is backed up by the census bureau). Now, the U.S. prison system is 76% African American. With illegal aliens (not "immigrants") invading our country. This will decimate our previous core minorities (now its Hispanic) work opportunities. Which will what? Create more crime! (It cost on national average $23,000 year to house an inmate.) Read between the lines.

HAVE YOU HEARD THIS ONE: "It will cost to much to contain the border." Hey, stupid, lets use some basic math. The cost of health care, schooling, and national security illegal aliens impose on the American economy. Compared to building, maintaining, and patrolling a 2000 mile stretch is not even comparable. What is it worth, if one, just one, nuclear bomb makes it into an American city? 1 billion for 10 years of safety compared to 40 billion now? 100 billion if a nuclear bomb finds it way to L.A. Are you kidding me nimrod?

Mexicans like to say, "We are just reclaiming what was once ours". Boy, it must hurt to be this ignorant. One, Mexico stole land from Guatemala! This is fact. Two, The California territory had a massive Spanish population. There were few permanent residents of non-Hispanic birth or descent before 1824. In addition, the Hispanic population of the California territory, is estimated, to be around 100,000 and 2,500 of white European descent during 1845. Lets also not dismiss, so quickly, that Mexico gave an enormous land grant of 48,000 acres to Johann August Sutter. Why, because they could not manage it! They wanted profits! Mexico defined California as a providence. So, If the vast majority of the California voted to join the Union and Europeans were only 2,500 out of 100,000 HOW IS THIS THEFT?!!!

Last time I checked Canada to Chile already had an indigenous population. Every single country is on "stolen land". But hey, Its always the "WHITE AMERICAN REPUBLICAN DEVIL" trying to corrupt and steal right?

We are not fighting a war of Communism vs. Democracy. This is a battle to protect our sovereignty as a nation. A fight to enjoy our way of life that our forefathers busted their ass and died for, to create, maintain, and proliferate. This is not Berlin. This is not Hadrian's Wall. This wall stands for something completely different. If you are not able to grasp this concept you will one day. This day will be when crime is out of control and we no longer have the resources to support our population. Its simple math. Do not fool yourself even mighty Rome fell in 40 years. Wake up!

Respectfully,
The Napalm

Before you respond at all, chew on this...

http://youtube.com/watch?v=n7WJeqxuOfQ

http://youtube.com/watch?v=cY6t2ckpb5g

http://youtube.com/watch?v=BQLFfTd2l44

http://youtube.com/watch?v=O-pHNmC5bps

P.S. Don't give me that "Cheap Fruit" argument it will only show your inability to look at the entire economical picture. No, really... don't embarrass yourself.

Wednesday, October 24, 2007

.: Thomas Jefferson A Proud Card Carrying Member Of The NRA? :.


Amendment II (the Second Amendment) of the United States Constitution, which is part of the Bill of Rights, declares "a well regulated militia " as "being necessary to the security of a free State", and prohibits Congress or any other government agency from infringement of "the right of the people to keep and bear arms."

Be vigilant of those who want to dissolve your rights! They start slowly with a smile, reassuring you they know what’s best for you and society…

The second amendment was created to ENSURE that the government could never dominate over its citizens.

What is truly horrifying is that these individuals don’t even comprehend the components or the language of their own bills! So easily they are willing to meet their own agenda, giving not even a thought to what our founding fathers established for our safety, security, and God given right to pursue happiness.

Never forget these men lived in a time far different than ours. They where products of a tyrannical Europe. They knew the oppression government could lay upon their citizens. This is why they over threw it and created the most democratic nation the world has ever seen.

Do you understand why it is important that we keep this right? You never want one body more powerful than the other. The bodies of power being the government and the people. One armed and one unarmed? It gives the Politians unlimited power. Hitler used gun control to kill 6 million people. Do you think those Jews in Poland would have jumped on the train if they had all been armed with an M4? Stalin and Pol Pot also disarmed their populations before killing millions.

Remember, assault is a behavior, not a device. If I wanted to, I can beat someone to death with a toaster at the end of a cord. Maybe we should ban those sons of bitches. If our laws reduce our second amendment to revolvers, pumps and slides, like some would like to see. Then how can we be expected to defend ourselves against M-60s and others weapons designed for combat??? We would never want to be in this position.

Maybe violators of our rights like the uniformed Carolyn McCarthy should take a good hard look and see what impact her uneducated transgressions will have on ALL Americans down the road. Maybe, she should look to her parties’ shrine of democracy for the answer..

Laws that forbid the carrying of arms… disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes
-Thomas Jefferson

Do you see the smile on the liberals face?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9rGpykAX1fo

NOW THE TRUTH AND BOY DOES IT HURT.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sfKADcfE90U

RESPECTFULLY,

THE NAPALM

P.S. I don't own a gun



Saturday, October 20, 2007

Just Follow the Money

Tensions stemming from the 1915 mass killings of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire are a bitter point of contention, with the Armenian state decrying the killings as genocide; the modern Turkish state denying that a genocide of Armenians occurred in the waning days of the Ottoman Empire. Merely to speak of the Armenian Genocide in modern Turkey is to risk "insulting turkishness", a criminal offense for which various Turkish intelligentsia have been brought to trial.

Most reasonable historians will agree that a Ottoman massacre of Armenians did occur. In fact the United States House of Representatives passed resolutions in 1975 and 1985 consistent with this.

So why is it necessary that the United States House of Representative lead by Nancy Pelosi continue to bring this issue to the house floor? Especially when Ms. Pelosi is well aware that this will embarrass and isolate a courageous modern Islamic government in a region that has very few.

The time line is very interesting consider on October 10, 2007 a very cavalier Ms. Pelosi decided that a decision in the House will be passed on this issue before the end of November. On the 17th of October by another related vote the Turkish Parliament allowed their military to pursue the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) into Northern Iraq. All estimates agree this will not only destabilize perhaps the worlds most volatile region however also strain relations between a key ally on the war in Iraq.

If America continues to persist in dishing out what Turks believe as a great insult they will not allow us any of the benefits necessary to winning this war. Currently 3/4 of all cargo passes into Iraq is through Incirlik Air base in Southern Turkey. The US Air force fly freely through Turkish airspace on missions to Afghanistan and Iraq. The US Navy uses Turkish ports to refuel and reload. Turkey currently provides Iraq its electricity. Supply trucks loaded with fuel enter through the Turkish-Iraq border.

So to conclude I have two questions for the Conservative Chatroom.

Why is it necessary that the United States House of Representative lead by Nancy Pelosi continue to bring this issue to the house floor?

Whose constituency in the state of California include many rich Armenians?

Thank you Ms. Pelosi for putting Armenian lobbyist in front of the well being of the greatest nation on GODS green earth.

Thursday, October 11, 2007

How Can Conservatives Reason with the Pacifist Mindset?

How do you communicate with a pacifist who does not comprehend the necessity of war? When one says we deserved 911 for being imperialists forcing democracy on a culture of dictatorship? Or forcing our ideals onto other cultures?

These are not easy questions to answer. This is typically when us conservatives bang our head against the wall. Don't you hate when you find out a friend thinks this way? Funny how they now longer they are as close to you as you once thought!

How the hell is this so difficult to understand? Especially when battling a liberal. Take a look at history! The funny thing is how Liberals always fancy themselves as so cultured and well versed in history. Conflict existed then, and it exists now. Survival of the fittest was (and still is!) the basis of the hierarchy in society.

The most relevant example in history that illustrates this was Hitler in World War II. He needed to be dealt with. How come we don't hear pacifists complaining, picketing, filing lawsuits etc for taking out Adolf Hitler? Its because war was the indisputably the right solution!

The answer is simple. There is a time and a place to go to war. And now is the time and the Middle East is the place!

First Baghdad..... Next Tehran!

Wednesday, October 10, 2007

Guiliani's History....

Does it really matter that Guiliani has been married 3 times?

Does the fact that Guiliani lived with 2 homosexuals at the fall of his 2nd marriage damage his credibility among traditional conservatives?

Does Guiliani's daughter's endorsement of Obama represent instability on the home front?

Tuesday, October 9, 2007

Black Cracker Movement?

For those with limited exposure to the Hip Hop world I would like to enlighten my friends to a new movement called the Black Cracker Movement.
Purpose of the Racist Movement is as follows:
  • Promotion of the black race by diminishing the white race
  • Continue to sell drugs.. However only to White kids
  • Continue to knock up Ho's but only white girls
  • Seek to become educated to gain ground on white counterpart
You can read about it from this hip hop blog below. You need to scroll down a bit, but there are a few entries about it.

http://blogs.sohh.com/atlanta/2007/09/poppin_or_flopp_19.html


Thats it in a nut shell. What do think about that?

Deerborn, Michigan Republican Debates

Unfortunately did not get a chance to see the entire debate. Based on what I saw, I thought Guiliani looked strong as did Romney. Thompson looked weak. As weak and unprepared as he looked in San Diego in July when I met him at Hannity's Freedom Concert. He's does not have the charisma, gate, nor eye contact that historical leaders have possessed.

How about Ron Paul? He looked pretty strong!